Xiscthulhu



Anonymous asked:

why is self diagnosis bad

Xiscthulhu answered:

sewer-mermaid:

from psychologytoday.com

  • When you self-diagnose, you are essentially assuming that you know the subtleties that diagnosis constitutes. This can be very dangerous, as people who assume that they can surmise what is going on with themselves may miss the nuances of diagnosis. For example, people with mood swings often think that they have manic-depressive illness or bipolar disorder. However, mood swings are a symptom that can be a part of many different clinical scenarios, borderline personality disorder and major depression being two examples of other diagnoses. The clinician can help you discern whether you swing from normal to down or down to up, and by considering how long the mood swings last, the clinician can make the appropriate diagnosis. Here, the danger is that you may misdirect the clinician or even yourself.
  • One of the greatest dangers of self diagnosis in psychological syndromes, is that you may miss a medical disease that masquerades as a psychiatric syndrome. Thus, if you have panic disorder, you may miss the diagnosis of hyperthyroidism or an irregular heart beat. Even more serious is the fact that some brain tumors may present with changes in personality or psychosis or even depression. If you assume you have depression and treat it with an over-the-counter preparation, you may completely miss a medical syndrome. Even if you do not want conventional treatment for depression, you may want conventional treatment for a brain tumor.
  • Self-diagnosis also undermines the role of the doctor-which is not the best way to start the relationship. While doctors are generally very enthusiastic about getting packaged information, it would help if you actually trusted your doctor. If your doctor is someone whom you cannot trust, then think again about why you see this doctor. Your doctor should respect your opinion, but the discussion should be an active one. If you doubt the doctor’s diagnosis, tell him or her that you do and say why. This is much better than silently diagnosing your own syndrome.
  • Then there is the fact that we can know and see ourselves, but sometimes, we need a mirror to see ourselves more clearly. The doctor is that mirror. By self-diagnosing, you may be missing something that you cannot see. For example, you may be overwhelmed by anxiety and think that you have an anxiety disorder. The anxiety disorder may be covering up a major depressive disorder. Approximately 2/3 of people who present to outpatient clinics with anxiety have depression as well. In general, when two or more syndromes occur in the same person, we call this comorbidity. When people self-diagnose, they often miss the comorbidity that exists.
  • Another danger of self diagnosis is that you may think that there is more wrong with you than there actually is. For example, if you had insomnia, inattention and depression, you may believe that you have a sleep disorder, ADD and major depression. However, major depression can account for all of these symptoms. Thus, you may make things worse by worrying more as well.
  • Self-diagnosis is also a problem when you are in a state of denial about your symptoms. You may think that you have generalized body aches that started when your mood got worse, but a doctor may elect to do an EKG for chest pain that reveals possible coronary artery disease. You may have been trying to avoid the chest pain or you may have minimized this.
  • Lastly, there are certain syndromes that may not seem like problems to you even though they are very disruptive to your life. For example, with delusional disorder people do not think that they are delusional and because they are not overtly psychotic, they may not think to report paranoid symptoms that add up to delusional disorder. Also, many personality disorders are not spontaneously reported since they are usually problematic to other people.
  • Thus, self-diagnosis can have tremendous negative repercussions on the patient. For this reason, while reading is helpful and informative, it is always best to discuss your impressions with a doctor before you decide on the treatment you want.
Permalink · 55 · 4 hours ago

La desaparición de 400 gnomos causa un escándalo político en Austria

mantengamosloasi:

Muy mal tiene que estar la cosa (tanto electoral como en el apartado de Buenas Ideas) para que un partido decida que sus posibilidades de ganar unas elecciones dependen de colocar gnomos con gafas de sol por todo un estado federal.

La verdad es que el que alguien robe los gnomos no nos parece para tanto. Si acaso, un acto de buen vecino y ciudadano. El partido socialdemócrata austriaco, dueño de la ¿horda? ¿Rebaño? ¿Piara? de gnomos no está de acuerdo, y han pataleado, denunciado y acusado al partido conservador del país de estar detrás del robo. Esto ha dado lugar a lo que constituye la guinda en esta entretenida historia: las solemnes declaraciones del líder local del partido popular, en las que ha afirmado que los que hacen acusaciones así sin ton ni son no son mejores que los propios ladrones de los gnomos.

Es decir, lo de robar los gnomos NO ES UNA BROMA. Es un hecho SERIO y, en realidad, delictivo: aunque el valor de cada gnomo no es muy alto (el partido socialista se ha gastado unos 500.000 euros en 20.000 gnomos, por lo que cada uno vale veinticinco euros), la cantidad de los mismos (400 han sido robados) y el hecho de que estén pagados con dinero público hace que la audaz acción convierta a sus autores en criminales perseguidos.

Obviamente, Mundo Extraño está dispuesto a encabezar una campaña para que todos los carteles electorales en España sean sustituidos por flamencas de porcelana.

Permalink · 6 · 5 hours ago
Permalink · 52 · 5 hours ago
Permalink · 58392 · 5 hours ago
Permalink · 811 · 5 hours ago

On Writing Tropes

dgaider:

"In “Women vs. Tropes in Video Games: Women as Background Decoration Pt. 2, one of Ms. Sarkeesian’s solutions to appropriately handling controversial topics such as violence against women is to create games that directly and singularly explore controversial tropes rather than…

Permalink · 252 · 6 hours ago